Mar 01

Form 8880 Saver’s Credit Work Around

Saver’s Credit, Form 8880, has generated several questions asking why a taxpayer is not receiving the credit when it was allowed on a prior year return with similar entries. 

  • Obviously, if income limits are exceeded, there is no credit.  But when a taxpayer voluntarily contributes to a qualified retirement plan (Code D on W2, or an IRA as examples) AND receives a distribution on a 1099R, that distribution is an offset dollar for dollar to the contribution.  That offset occurs with most, but not all, retirement income.  See Pub 4012, G 6 and 7 for details.
  • Any income received by TP from a plan to which contributions were mandatory (not voluntary) should not offset the credit.  The most common example is military retirement, which is mandatory and should not reduce/offset the Saver’s Credit.  However, TaxSlayer treats all 1099R income as offset.
  • So, another workaround from NTTC:  on the TS 8880 input page, enter the TP’s total military retirement income as a negative number on the line that says “Enter Any Other Taxable Distributions in 2016 or 2015.”   That prevents the offset.
Feb 25

Volunteer Tax Alert

The IRS has issued Volunteer Tax Alert VTA 2017-01 that covers claiming education benefits without a Form 1098-T. Please ensure this VTA is distributed to all sites for review with all Counselors. Sites will be required to have this available either electronically or in paper. A CyberTax containing this information will be sent to the field soon.


Dec 28

NTTC Guidance for Unclaimed Dependent for ACA 2016-12-28

NTTC Guidance for Unclaimed Dependent for ACA 2016-12-28 by Steve Conary

The instructions in Pubs 4491 and 4012 and for the Affordable Care Act forms are incomplete regarding the requirement to include every dependent, whether claimed or not, when determining if a Shared Responsibility Payment (SRP) is due. After extensive discussions with IRS SPEC and guidance from IRS Counsel and the IRS ACA Program Office, the National Tax Training Committee guidance has not changed: a taxpayer does not owe an SRP for an unclaimed dependent, even if the unclaimed dependent lacks health coverage. The unclaimed dependent can be left off the return for ACA purposes.

While a taxpayer is technically responsible for their dependent’s health insurance coverage, whether claimed or not, a taxpayer does not have to claim a dependent if he or she chooses not to. The ACA provisions are then applied to the taxpayer/spouse and claimed dependents only (exclusive of the unclaimed dependent). The ACA exemption provisions are applied to the unclaimed dependent separately.

Importantly, household income for a taxpayer includes only the taxpayer’s income, the income of the taxpayer’s spouse if filing jointly, and the income of claimed dependents. An unclaimed dependent has a separate household income from the taxpayer who could claim that dependent.

IRS SPEC has confirmed that the affordability test is applied separately to an unclaimed dependent. Accordingly, if a taxpayer wants to claim an affordability exemption for an unclaimed dependent, he must determine that dependent’s eligibility for the exemption using that unclaimed dependent’s own income only. If the unclaimed dependent had an employer offer for self-only coverage, he or she would test the affordability of that employer offer against his or her separate affordability threshold. If there is no employer self-only offer, the unclaimed dependent would compare his or her separate lowest cost bronze plan premium to his or her separate affordability threshold (with no premium tax credit (PTC) – he or she is not an applicable taxpayer and is not eligible for PTC.). Thus, it is safe to assume that, at a minimum, the affordability exemption applies to the unclaimed dependent given that his or her income is low since he or she could be claimed as a dependent.

The instructions do not address exemptions for the unclaimed dependent situation. In theory, the taxpayer who could claim the dependent should claim the exemption on his return. The IRS has stated that in practice, it is unlikely that a taxpayer who failed to claim a dependent would simultaneously claim an ACA exemption for that dependent

ACA is not perfect and the IRS recognizes this particular nuance in the law. There may be corrective legislation in the future.